Purim, a few days late
Mar. 23rd, 2006 07:40 amAgainst the better counsel of a wise friend, I got myself the Artscroll Megillah, "a new translation with a commentary anthologized from Talmudic, Midrashic, and Rabbinic sources." Boy, did I ever catch the wrong end of the stick! The commentary basically tries to force the rather incongruous elements of the story into a conventional moralizing piety. Purim is a religious holiday, so a little piety is OK, but not the Jewish equivalent of Victorian Black Crepe (or, "Crape.")
I'm sure this is not a novel observation, but Purim is about the most staggeringly successful intermarriage that ever was -- a match which could only happen by chance (as in lot, pur) between a doe-eyed Israelite and a biblous sheygetz straight out of the pages of a Babylonian John Cheever. (Persian martinis, anyone?) The sky doesn't come crashing down, plague and pestilence do not beset the Jews, and nobody asks how the children will be brought up. God smiles upon the entire affair.
Rabbi Arthur Scroll (the collective religious authority of Mesorah Publications, Inc.) has nothing to say about this. The same genius who trotted out an absurd theory that Asenath, Joseph's wife, was miraculously Jewish, even though she was a cow-worshipping Egyptian, has nary a justificatory footnote for King Achashverosh.
I think the CJLS has some re-interpretation to do in light of this timely Orthodox omission. We need more sons who are unable to ask the question.
I'm sure this is not a novel observation, but Purim is about the most staggeringly successful intermarriage that ever was -- a match which could only happen by chance (as in lot, pur) between a doe-eyed Israelite and a biblous sheygetz straight out of the pages of a Babylonian John Cheever. (Persian martinis, anyone?) The sky doesn't come crashing down, plague and pestilence do not beset the Jews, and nobody asks how the children will be brought up. God smiles upon the entire affair.
Rabbi Arthur Scroll (the collective religious authority of Mesorah Publications, Inc.) has nothing to say about this. The same genius who trotted out an absurd theory that Asenath, Joseph's wife, was miraculously Jewish, even though she was a cow-worshipping Egyptian, has nary a justificatory footnote for King Achashverosh.
I think the CJLS has some re-interpretation to do in light of this timely Orthodox omission. We need more sons who are unable to ask the question.